Skip to main content

Is missionary work superstitious and hindrance to progress?

In the past centuries, some have risen with certain objections to missionary work. Few of the objections are as follows (do you think that they invalidate Christianity or the seriousness of the Great Commission?):

1. Missionaries destroy native cultures to establish or expand their own.
2. Missionaries are self-conceited, ambitious, and fanatical.
3. Missionaries have oppressed and been the cause of the backwardness of several civilizations.
4. The Christian view that Jesus takes all our sins gives Missionaries license to do what they like.
5. The Crusades, the Portuguese invasion of Goa, and Christian support of the Nazis are evidence that Christianity has been responsible for genocides as well.
6. The Church has also burnt innocent women as witch-hunting.

My answers are concise:
1. Activities by Christians or missionaries cannot be considered "Christian" unless they follow the principles of the Bible. If one can point to "unjustifiable" actions by Christians, then the similar can be undeniably found in other religions as well. A valid connection must be drawn between a religious principle and an action to relate it as such to it.
2. Some kind of cultural changes are bound to occur always, since culture is dynamic. Change is ubiquitous.
3. The Reformation and several such movements are evidence of the fact that Christianity cannot be labelled as so and so just by extrapolation of a segment of it's history somewhere.
4. The accusation that Christianity has sent civilizations backward is false. Africa and North-East India are examples of how Christianity converted cannibals and head-hunters into preachers of Christ love.
5. Let's ask, what would the world look like if the Bible and the Gospel were absent from it.
6. The reality of sin and the cross of Jesus Christ are historically undeniable and show the divine seriousness of publishing the good news.
7. The Bible says that "Where no oxen are, the crib is clean: but much increase is by the strength of the ox" (Prov. 14:4); we don't throw the baby with the bathwater!

Domenic Marbaniang,  30 April 2009, 04:31am

Comments

  1. I agree culture changes are bound to occur but missionaries are helping to change it quite fast while destroying the native cultures, languages and tribal life.
    I always wonder why there is need for conversion?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You mean religious conversion. That's right. What we actually need is change from the blatant wrong ways. We need right beliefs, right perspective, and right works. If a man doesn't have these, then there we see the need for a change, because he is in the wrong way. For instance, a missionary who preaches the words of Jesus, but doesn't practice them is in need of a change. Similarly, a politician who spends lot of time in puja, but then comes out and practices corruption and bribery, needs change. The Bible states it very clearly that conversion is nothing but repentance from sinful conduct and a turning to God. The purpose why Jesus Christ came to this world was to call people to repentance and become a Mediator between men and God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Water Baptism Necessary Before Partaking in Lord's Supper

"Last Supper" by Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo (1750) Yes, it is. Water baptism identifies one with the redemption work of Jesus Christ, with His death, burial, and resurrection. It is anticipated of visible identification with Christ and His Church. Every person has the personal responsibility to examine him/herself before deciding to partake in the Lord's Table. The Bible makes it clear that those who chose not to be baptized were rejecting the counsel of God (Lk.7:30). In a mixed congregation, it is not possible to always know who is worthy to partake of the Table; however, the minister must encourage only those who have been baptized for remission of sins (not just as a ritual but by faith in Jesus Christ) to partake of the Table. Before Jesus sat down to dip bread in the cup, He washed His disciples' feet. He makes the statement that they are already "washed" and only need feet to be washed. Of course, this may not explicitly/only refer to their baptism, fo

Matthew 6:31-33

"Therefore do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you." (Mat 6:31-33) The original sense of nakedness was from that deep insecurity of autonomy that sprung from man's first alienation from God due to sin-- spiritual death. Seeking God marks man's refusal to stay alienated by turning towards His Maker in whom alone is Covering and true Security and no reason to be ashamed anymore.

Placebo and the Philosophy of Mind and Matter in Drug Research

A placebo is a non-therapeutic substance administered under the camouflage of medication to deceive patients into believing that they are receiving medications; this done solely for psychological and not for physiological effects. Placebo may usually be used to compare its effects with the effects of other drugs in drug research. Let's take the case of an experiment that tries to establish whether a particular drug, say to treat weariness, is genuine or merely has the effects of a placebo. Suppose 20 candidates are chosen for this experiment. 10 are given the drug and the rest are put on a placebo while they are told that the placebo is a genuine medication. They need to make sure that the deception is well carried on for the success of the experiment. If both the groups make similar improvements after taking the treatments, the new drug seems to only function as a placebo in effect. The basic hypothesis of the placebo raises the question of mind over matter. Of course, this pushes