Skip to main content

Is missionary work superstitious and hindrance to progress?

In the past centuries, some have risen with certain objections to missionary work. Few of the objections are as follows (do you think that they invalidate Christianity or the seriousness of the Great Commission?):

1. Missionaries destroy native cultures to establish or expand their own.
2. Missionaries are self-conceited, ambitious, and fanatical.
3. Missionaries have oppressed and been the cause of the backwardness of several civilizations.
4. The Christian view that Jesus takes all our sins gives Missionaries license to do what they like.
5. The Crusades, the Portuguese invasion of Goa, and Christian support of the Nazis are evidence that Christianity has been responsible for genocides as well.
6. The Church has also burnt innocent women as witch-hunting.

My answers are concise:
1. Activities by Christians or missionaries cannot be considered "Christian" unless they follow the principles of the Bible. If one can point to "unjustifiable" actions by Christians, then the similar can be undeniably found in other religions as well. A valid connection must be drawn between a religious principle and an action to relate it as such to it.
2. Some kind of cultural changes are bound to occur always, since culture is dynamic. Change is ubiquitous.
3. The Reformation and several such movements are evidence of the fact that Christianity cannot be labelled as so and so just by extrapolation of a segment of it's history somewhere.
4. The accusation that Christianity has sent civilizations backward is false. Africa and North-East India are examples of how Christianity converted cannibals and head-hunters into preachers of Christ love.
5. Let's ask, what would the world look like if the Bible and the Gospel were absent from it.
6. The reality of sin and the cross of Jesus Christ are historically undeniable and show the divine seriousness of publishing the good news.
7. The Bible says that "Where no oxen are, the crib is clean: but much increase is by the strength of the ox" (Prov. 14:4); we don't throw the baby with the bathwater!

Domenic Marbaniang,  30 April 2009, 04:31am

Comments

  1. I agree culture changes are bound to occur but missionaries are helping to change it quite fast while destroying the native cultures, languages and tribal life.
    I always wonder why there is need for conversion?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You mean religious conversion. That's right. What we actually need is change from the blatant wrong ways. We need right beliefs, right perspective, and right works. If a man doesn't have these, then there we see the need for a change, because he is in the wrong way. For instance, a missionary who preaches the words of Jesus, but doesn't practice them is in need of a change. Similarly, a politician who spends lot of time in puja, but then comes out and practices corruption and bribery, needs change. The Bible states it very clearly that conversion is nothing but repentance from sinful conduct and a turning to God. The purpose why Jesus Christ came to this world was to call people to repentance and become a Mediator between men and God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Do We Know If An Opportunity Is From God?

1. Usually, it should be clear; but, if there is doubt, then there are reasons to reconsider (Rom.14:23) 2. Sometimes the goal may be noble, but the opportunity not. Any opportunity that compels you to hurry ahead of God will land you in a crash (Jer.48:10). 3. It should not invite you to do things or employ means that the Bible clearly forbids. If it does so, it is not divine opportunity but temptation to sin (James 1:13). 4. It should not tempt God, i.e. it should not be something like "I will jump from the pinnacle, He will send His angels in time to save me, because His Word promises so" (Matt.4:6,7). It will lead to disaster. 5. It should not be forced by human whims, even so-called prophecy or divine leading, especially when you don't have peace about it in your heart. Remember how a young prophet fell prey to a lion because he disobeyed God by listening to the lie of a prophet (1Kgs.13:16-24). There is a reason why Paul mentioned that when He heard God's cal...

Reliability, Predictability, and Paul the Octopus

Paul the Octopus has recently become very famous after his predictions for Germany and Spain during the World Cup 2010 came right. The 100% accuracy tag distinguishes him from any other diviner who had attempted a prediction during the World Cup. There were responses and reactions from various people including sportsmen, statesmen, and mathematicians. Whatever, the use of Paul has demonstrated once again that mankind's search for an extra-temporal, psychic foresight has not quelled through the historical calendar returning a decade over this millennium. The question before us is can such predictions as those of Paul be counted on as reliable (in other words, can they be seriously taken as true)? The mathematicians have plumped for chance. It's all a matter of probability, they say ( BBC News ). However, the argument of chance in itself is weak. The mathematics of chance will calculate that the probability of Paul being right seven times out of seven is 1/128. But, the conclusi...