Skip to main content

Attacks on God

There are two ways of getting known by the world; get famous or get infamous. John Wilkes Booth, the assassin of Abraham Lincoln already had some fame; however, as Dale Carnegie tells us in his Lincoln the Unknown, it was his desire for more popularity that drove him to kill the most famous man in America. Somehow, the assassin believes assassination as being a short-cut to popularity-control. You kill the king and usurp his throne. Of course, John Wilkes Booth was shot dead sooner; he didn't become the President of United States; but, he did became infamous.

There are a number of provocative titles that drop into the market and create enough ripples, waves, and commotion. Some of them become know for their audacity against common faith. Some may be offensive tools (not apologetical but crusader like, negative jihadist attacks, meant to conquer the centrality of the opponent's faith). These people are serious about what they say. They are willing to die for what they contend for. The others are merely big mouthing tactics. They are like Rabshekah in the Biblical story; he came and shouted audaciously, vociferously, and quite volubly in order to catch attention and put Jerusalem into panic. But, of course, he failed. However, most times such loud-mouthing gets successful as the enemy gets down from the walls and comes out in surrender (compromise) with the more voluminous.

But, there is another kind who only wages verbal warfare, from bulletproof cover zones, in order to get commercially successful. A provocative title might attract much attention and readership; however, one doubts if the writer is willing to die for the claims and arguments he is making. However, the contradictory words somehow are successful in engaging certain apologists into discussion. The result: a lot more people who didn't know about these books get to know these books; some go out and buy these books. One way or the other, the books become commercially successful. Curiosity, threat, and hurt do compel engagement for some. However, we must understand that there are a few talks that the Christian is not called to engage in. We must understand that some challenges can be ignored. The Bible gives us a better solution:

Beloved, I beg you as sojourners and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul, having your conduct honorable among the Gentiles, that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may, by your good works which they observe, glorify God in the day of visitation. (1Pe 2:11-12 NKJ)

Also, Christian leaders are reminded:
Avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless. (Tit 3:9 NKJ)

Finally, we must remember that there are cases that are not open for us anymore to deal with. We must have love towards all; however, we also know that an attack on God is not any attack at all. We do not need to be threatened. Apologetics exists only to contend for the truth, to clarify misunderstandings, and to help those who have difficulty with faith (1Pet.3:15; Jude 1:3; Acts 17:2,17; 18:4,19); it does not exist to debate with those who have made up their minds.

"If anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which accords with godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings1 of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. From such withdraw yourself" (1Ti 6:3-5 NKJ)

"Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him." (Jud 1:14-15 NKJ)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Placebo and the Philosophy of Mind and Matter in Drug Research

A placebo is a non-therapeutic substance administered under the camouflage of medication to deceive patients into believing that they are receiving medications; this done solely for psychological and not for physiological effects. Placebo may usually be used to compare its effects with the effects of other drugs in drug research. Let's take the case of an experiment that tries to establish whether a particular drug, say to treat weariness, is genuine or merely has the effects of a placebo. Suppose 20 candidates are chosen for this experiment. 10 are given the drug and the rest are put on a placebo while they are told that the placebo is a genuine medication. They need to make sure that the deception is well carried on for the success of the experiment. If both the groups make similar improvements after taking the treatments, the new drug seems to only function as a placebo in effect. The basic hypothesis of the placebo raises the question of mind over matter. Of course, this pushes...

What is Theology? Its Divisions with Short Descriptions

Published in REVIVE, May 2012 (Malayalam Edition) A simple and literal definition of “theology” would be “the science of divine things”. It comes from two Greek words theos meaning “God” and logia meaning “discourse or speech”. In modern times, it is the stream of knowledge that differentiates the secular pursuit of knowledge from the sacred one because of its starting point: all secular studies begin with reason and experience while theology begins with faith. The starting point for all extra-theological studies is the world (Latin: saeculum); the starting point for theology is the Word of God. So, while one may say that theology is the study of God, the factual definition would be that theology is the science that rationally pursues the understanding of the self-revelation of God in the Scriptures. It would be interesting to note that many of the universities had originally begun as seminaries and theology was once known as the Queen of Sciences. However, with the dawn of theAge of E...

Reliability, Predictability, and Paul the Octopus

Paul the Octopus has recently become very famous after his predictions for Germany and Spain during the World Cup 2010 came right. The 100% accuracy tag distinguishes him from any other diviner who had attempted a prediction during the World Cup. There were responses and reactions from various people including sportsmen, statesmen, and mathematicians. Whatever, the use of Paul has demonstrated once again that mankind's search for an extra-temporal, psychic foresight has not quelled through the historical calendar returning a decade over this millennium. The question before us is can such predictions as those of Paul be counted on as reliable (in other words, can they be seriously taken as true)? The mathematicians have plumped for chance. It's all a matter of probability, they say ( BBC News ). However, the argument of chance in itself is weak. The mathematics of chance will calculate that the probability of Paul being right seven times out of seven is 1/128. But, the conclusi...