Skip to main content

God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ

IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, God was known as the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob. He was the God of the Fathers. The possessive phrase "of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob" reminded of at least three aspects of the YHWH-Israel relationship:

1. The Covenant-Basis of the Relationship. God made a covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and with their descendants; so, Israel stood in a covenant relationship with God. (2Kgs.13:23)
2. The Continuity of the Relationship. Jesus declared that the phrase "of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob" implied that God was the God of the living and not of the dead. The phrase didn't become obsolete when the three patriarchs physically died. The phrase was valid because they were alive in the spirit, and God was the God of living; which also meant that the relationship was a living and continuing one (Matt.22:32; Mark 12:25,26; Matt.8:11). God's relationship with Israel as a nation didn't die when the patriarchs died physically. It continues on.
3. The Completeness of the Relationship. God made sure to ratify His covenant with each of the fathers. It was irrevocable and complete. The line of blessing was specifically chosen. Of course, Ishmael had to go; and so, Esau. But, the identity of the children of Israel as a chosen covenant people was established completely in the line of Abraham-Isaac-Jacob.

This further revealed their
Rootedness as a nation in God, by God, of God, and for God.
Responsibility as a nation in God, by God, of God, and for God.

IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, however, with regard to the Church, the phrase "of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob" is not used. Of course, Jesus did speak of people coming from various parts to sit at table with the three patriarchs when the Kingdom comes (Matt.8:11); and Peter used it with respect to the Jews (Acts 3:13); however, the possessive phrase used for the disciples of Christ is different. God is called as:

God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ (Phil.1:2; Col.1:2; 1Thess.1:1)
God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (2Cor.1:3; 11:31; Eph.1:3; Col.1:3; 1Pet.1:3)
God of our Lord Jesus Christ (Eph.1:17)
From God the Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, in truth and love (2Jn.1:3)


For sure, this relationship is a stronger Covenant Relationship (Heb.12:24), an eternally Continuing Relationship (Heb.7:16,17), and an absolutely Complete Relationship (Heb.6:18; Col.2:10). But, the phrases, noticeably have also at least two different versions. The first is:

"God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ" (2Cor.1:3; 11:31; Eph.1:3; Col.1:3; 1Pet.1:3)

It reminds us of four things:
1. The Finality of Revelation in Christ. In the old, God spoke through the fathers; but, in the last days through His Son. (Heb.1:1,2)
2. The Fatherhood of God in Christ. God is not just the God of our fathers, but He is God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Christ is called as the Son. (Of course, He is called the "Everlasting Father" in Isaiah 9:6; however, in the Triune relationship with us, He is the Firstborn). Zac Poonen has pointed out that Christ was always called as the only begotten Son before His resurrection; but, after His resurrection, He is known as the Firstborn among many brethren (Rom.8:29). We don't look back to our fathers as a second or third generation; but, we look back directly to God who Himself is our Father through our Lord Jesus Christ.
3. The Fullness of the Authority of Christ. Unlike Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, Jesus died and rose and again and is exalted to the right hand of God and is given a Name above all names. He is our Lord. His authority in the Church and in His Kingdom is complete and final. While the Jews looked back at the patriarchs as their fathers, we look up to Jesus as our Lord.
4. The Favor of God on all humanity through Christ. It points us to our Root; the one who is called the Source and Root of Jesse (Israel) is now also the hope of all mankind (both Jews and Gentiles alike). (Isaiah 11:10; Rom.15:12). The identity of the Christian doesn't come from any race, religion, culture, or language; but, it comes from Christ alone. While the Jews could proudly talk of the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, the believers could only joyfully talk of the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The other version of the phrase is:
God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ (Phil.1:2; Col.1:2; 1Thess.1:1).

This is usually used in statements where there is a talk of proceeding from (grace and mercy from) or identity in (1Thess.1:1). The phrase also implies at least three facts:

1. The Co-Equality of the Son with the Father. The conjunction "and" places the two persons of the Divine Godhead together.
2. The Co-Substantiality of the Son with the Father. The identity of the Church in God and the Son as well as the procession of grace and mercy from God and the Son point to the unity that is within the Godhead. There are not two sources but one (Rev.22:1).
3. The Co-Eternality of the Son with the Father. The above two logically imply the understanding of the Son as co-eternal with the Father.

Therefore, Paul calls it the mystery of godliness:
Without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Preached among the Gentiles, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory. (1Ti 3:16 NKJ)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Placebo and the Philosophy of Mind and Matter in Drug Research

A placebo is a non-therapeutic substance administered under the camouflage of medication to deceive patients into believing that they are receiving medications; this done solely for psychological and not for physiological effects. Placebo may usually be used to compare its effects with the effects of other drugs in drug research. Let's take the case of an experiment that tries to establish whether a particular drug, say to treat weariness, is genuine or merely has the effects of a placebo. Suppose 20 candidates are chosen for this experiment. 10 are given the drug and the rest are put on a placebo while they are told that the placebo is a genuine medication. They need to make sure that the deception is well carried on for the success of the experiment. If both the groups make similar improvements after taking the treatments, the new drug seems to only function as a placebo in effect. The basic hypothesis of the placebo raises the question of mind over matter. Of course, this pushes...

What is Theology? Its Divisions with Short Descriptions

Published in REVIVE, May 2012 (Malayalam Edition) A simple and literal definition of “theology” would be “the science of divine things”. It comes from two Greek words theos meaning “God” and logia meaning “discourse or speech”. In modern times, it is the stream of knowledge that differentiates the secular pursuit of knowledge from the sacred one because of its starting point: all secular studies begin with reason and experience while theology begins with faith. The starting point for all extra-theological studies is the world (Latin: saeculum); the starting point for theology is the Word of God. So, while one may say that theology is the study of God, the factual definition would be that theology is the science that rationally pursues the understanding of the self-revelation of God in the Scriptures. It would be interesting to note that many of the universities had originally begun as seminaries and theology was once known as the Queen of Sciences. However, with the dawn of theAge of E...

Reliability, Predictability, and Paul the Octopus

Paul the Octopus has recently become very famous after his predictions for Germany and Spain during the World Cup 2010 came right. The 100% accuracy tag distinguishes him from any other diviner who had attempted a prediction during the World Cup. There were responses and reactions from various people including sportsmen, statesmen, and mathematicians. Whatever, the use of Paul has demonstrated once again that mankind's search for an extra-temporal, psychic foresight has not quelled through the historical calendar returning a decade over this millennium. The question before us is can such predictions as those of Paul be counted on as reliable (in other words, can they be seriously taken as true)? The mathematicians have plumped for chance. It's all a matter of probability, they say ( BBC News ). However, the argument of chance in itself is weak. The mathematics of chance will calculate that the probability of Paul being right seven times out of seven is 1/128. But, the conclusi...