Skip to main content

True Love is Not Blind; But Hatred is

The Bible doesn't say that love is blind. In fact, the Bible says that God is Love (1Jn.4:16) and there is no darkness in Him.

However, the Bible does say that he who hates his brother is in darkness and walks in darkness and does not know where he is going because the darkness has blinded his eyes (1Jn.2:11). In other words, it is not love that is blind; it is hatred that is blind.

There is a difference between true love (that really loves the other) and fake love (that pretends to love the other but actually is in love with self). For instance, a young man feels that he loves a woman; but, he finds out that she doesn't reciprocate his feelings; so, his feelings turn to hatred towards her. This is not true love. This is selfishness. If he had truly loved her, then he would be happy with what she is happy with; he would seek her happiness, not his. But, the fact that his feelings have revealed hatred prove that what he had in the first place was not love but hatred.

Does a spring send forth fresh water and bitter from the same opening?
Can a fig tree, my brethren, bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Thus no spring yields both salt water and fresh. (Jam 3:11-12 NKJ)


And the very fact that he was in selfish, idolatrous love only with himself proves that he doesn't have the capacity to love any other. He who is in selfish love with himself cannot love any other. For, no man can serve two masters; he will either hate the one and be loyal to the other, or be loyal to the one and hate the other (Matt.6:24).

To love oneself more than others is hellish (2Tim.3:2). The only true way to love oneself is to love others as oneself. The Bible says that a Christ-like husband loves his wife like he loves his own body; in fact, he who loves his wife loves himself (Eph.5:28).

Lust is a form of hatred; because the fruit of lust is not love but hatred. A man who forces a woman, a man who engages in pornography, a woman who seduces a man through lustful attraction all actually hate the other. They will rather desire that the other suffer than they suffer the consequences of their lust. Such was the case of Amnon who raped Tamar, his half-sister. His love (lust) for Tamar was consuming and passionate; it tormented him and made him feel ill (2Sam.13:2). The consuming passion was like the hunger of a beast who longs for its prey, not because he wishes the prey to live, but in order to satiate his own pangs of hunger. It cannot love the other. And so, when Amnon had done the abominable, the hatred of his lust became evident (2Sam.13:15).

When one shuts the other down, deletes the other, slanders the other, has ill-will against the other just because the other has not responded in a "complying" manner, then such aggressive behavior is only proof of the lack of the Spirit of love.

"For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?
"And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? (Mat 5:46-47 NKJ)


It is impossible for love not to love in any situation (Matt.5:44); for love is its nature. It can bear no other fruit.

But, true love is longsuffering, patient, kind, not easily provoked, not rude, not envious, not self-seeking; true love is rejoices in the truth, i.e. it accepts reality; true love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things; true love never fails (1Cor.13:4-8). True love is not blind.


Later Quotes & Entries
...the relation of self-affirmation and love toward others. For Spinoza the latter is an implication of the former.

Erich Fromm has fully expressed the idea that the right self-love and the right love of others are interdependent, and that selfishness and the abuse of others are equally interdependent. (Paul Tillich, The Courage to Be, p.22)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Placebo and the Philosophy of Mind and Matter in Drug Research

A placebo is a non-therapeutic substance administered under the camouflage of medication to deceive patients into believing that they are receiving medications; this done solely for psychological and not for physiological effects. Placebo may usually be used to compare its effects with the effects of other drugs in drug research. Let's take the case of an experiment that tries to establish whether a particular drug, say to treat weariness, is genuine or merely has the effects of a placebo. Suppose 20 candidates are chosen for this experiment. 10 are given the drug and the rest are put on a placebo while they are told that the placebo is a genuine medication. They need to make sure that the deception is well carried on for the success of the experiment. If both the groups make similar improvements after taking the treatments, the new drug seems to only function as a placebo in effect. The basic hypothesis of the placebo raises the question of mind over matter. Of course, this pushes...

Reliability, Predictability, and Paul the Octopus

Paul the Octopus has recently become very famous after his predictions for Germany and Spain during the World Cup 2010 came right. The 100% accuracy tag distinguishes him from any other diviner who had attempted a prediction during the World Cup. There were responses and reactions from various people including sportsmen, statesmen, and mathematicians. Whatever, the use of Paul has demonstrated once again that mankind's search for an extra-temporal, psychic foresight has not quelled through the historical calendar returning a decade over this millennium. The question before us is can such predictions as those of Paul be counted on as reliable (in other words, can they be seriously taken as true)? The mathematicians have plumped for chance. It's all a matter of probability, they say ( BBC News ). However, the argument of chance in itself is weak. The mathematics of chance will calculate that the probability of Paul being right seven times out of seven is 1/128. But, the conclusi...

What is Theology? Its Divisions with Short Descriptions

Published in REVIVE, May 2012 (Malayalam Edition) A simple and literal definition of “theology” would be “the science of divine things”. It comes from two Greek words theos meaning “God” and logia meaning “discourse or speech”. In modern times, it is the stream of knowledge that differentiates the secular pursuit of knowledge from the sacred one because of its starting point: all secular studies begin with reason and experience while theology begins with faith. The starting point for all extra-theological studies is the world (Latin: saeculum); the starting point for theology is the Word of God. So, while one may say that theology is the study of God, the factual definition would be that theology is the science that rationally pursues the understanding of the self-revelation of God in the Scriptures. It would be interesting to note that many of the universities had originally begun as seminaries and theology was once known as the Queen of Sciences. However, with the dawn of theAge of E...