Puzzle: Men with Black and White Hats

There are four men (A-B-C-D) standing on each step of a stairs. There is a wall between C and D so that none can see D. Each is wearing either a black or white hat. Two of them wear black hats and two of them wear white hats. Actually, A is wearing white; B, black; C, white; and D, black.

Rules:
1. None of them must talk to each other.
2. None of them can look behind.
3. None can remove his hat.

Who will be the first one to tell the color of his hat?

If you have tried very hard and are still curious to find out, scroll down.....

Answer:
B will answer. Let's check his reasoning.
1. If I was "C" I cannot know the color of my hat because I can neither see D nor can I look behind.
2. If I was "A" I could answer if I saw two black hats before me, I would know that I had white on; similarly, if I saw two white hats before me, then I would know that I had a black hat on. However, if I saw a black and a white hat, then I wouldn't be able to know what color hat I wore because I couldn't see D.
3. A is still silent, which means he sees a white and black hat.
4. I see a white hat before me on C.
5. Therefore, I am wearing a black hat.

Comments

Placebo and the Philosophy of Mind and Matter in Drug Research

A placebo is a non-therapeutic substance administered under the camouflage of medication to deceive patients into believing that they are receiving medications; this done solely for psychological and not for physiological effects. Placebo may usually be used to compare its effects with the effects of other drugs in drug research. Let's take the case of an experiment that tries to establish whether a particular drug, say to treat weariness, is genuine or merely has the effects of a placebo. Suppose 20 candidates are chosen for this experiment. 10 are given the drug and the rest are put on a placebo while they are told that the placebo is a genuine medication. They need to make sure that the deception is well carried on for the success of the experiment. If both the groups make similar improvements after taking the treatments, the new drug seems to only function as a placebo in effect. The basic hypothesis of the placebo raises the question of mind over matter. Of course, this pushes...

What is Theology? Its Divisions with Short Descriptions

Published in REVIVE, May 2012 (Malayalam Edition) A simple and literal definition of “theology” would be “the science of divine things”. It comes from two Greek words theos meaning “God” and logia meaning “discourse or speech”. In modern times, it is the stream of knowledge that differentiates the secular pursuit of knowledge from the sacred one because of its starting point: all secular studies begin with reason and experience while theology begins with faith. The starting point for all extra-theological studies is the world (Latin: saeculum); the starting point for theology is the Word of God. So, while one may say that theology is the study of God, the factual definition would be that theology is the science that rationally pursues the understanding of the self-revelation of God in the Scriptures. It would be interesting to note that many of the universities had originally begun as seminaries and theology was once known as the Queen of Sciences. However, with the dawn of theAge of E...

Reliability, Predictability, and Paul the Octopus

Paul the Octopus has recently become very famous after his predictions for Germany and Spain during the World Cup 2010 came right. The 100% accuracy tag distinguishes him from any other diviner who had attempted a prediction during the World Cup. There were responses and reactions from various people including sportsmen, statesmen, and mathematicians. Whatever, the use of Paul has demonstrated once again that mankind's search for an extra-temporal, psychic foresight has not quelled through the historical calendar returning a decade over this millennium. The question before us is can such predictions as those of Paul be counted on as reliable (in other words, can they be seriously taken as true)? The mathematicians have plumped for chance. It's all a matter of probability, they say ( BBC News ). However, the argument of chance in itself is weak. The mathematics of chance will calculate that the probability of Paul being right seven times out of seven is 1/128. But, the conclusi...

Marbaniang, Domenic

Search This Blog